Sadananda Gowda: Chief Justice's Claim On Need Of Judges Not Based On Scientific Research
Sadananda Gowda: Chief Justice's Claim On Need Of Judges Not Based On Scientific Research
Share:

NEW DELHI: Thursday, The government said the report mentioned by Chief Justice of India TS Thakur who claim that the country needed 40,000 judges was not based on any scientific research but maintained it has hastened efforts to fill up vacancies in Supreme Court.

Union Law Minister Sadananda Gowda said the adequacy of bench strength in a country is determined on the basis of workload on the courts and not judge-population ratio, he said while addressing a press conference to mark two years of the Narendra Modi government,

Virtually breaking down in the presence of the prime minister in Delhi on April 24, CJI TS Thakur had lamented the government's "inaction" in increasing the number of judges from the present 21,000 to 40,000 to handle the "avalanche" of litigations, saying, "you cannot shift the entire burden on the judiciary".

"Nothing has moved" since 1987 when the Law Commission had recommended increase in the number of judges from then 10 judges per 10 lakh people to 50, an unusually emotional Mr Thakur had said.

Responding to question Mr Gowda said, "In the report itself they said that this has to be calculated on the basis of scientific data. But no scientific data was available. Even recently in the Imtiaz Ahmed case, the Supreme Court itself has asked the Law Commission to once again look into the matter. They once again said that this may not be possible unless we get the scientific data”.

Disclaimer : The views, opinions, positions or strategies expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions or strategies of NTIPL, english.newstracklive.com or any employee thereof. NTIPL makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, correctness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.
NTIPL reserves the right to delete, edit, or alter in any manner it sees fit comments that it, in its sole discretion, deems to be obscene, offensive, defamatory, threatening, in violation of trademark, copyright or other laws, or is otherwise unacceptable.
Join NewsTrack Whatsapp group
Related News