New Delhi: In the 30th day hearing in the Supreme Court on the Ayodhya Ram temple and Babri Masjid case, the lawyer for the Muslim side, Rajiv Dhawan said, "I believe there are many beliefs about worship in India." Temples are installed where the parts of Goddess Sati fell, including the Kamakhya temple. To this, Justice Bobde said that one such temple also exists in Pakistan. Dhawan said, but going to the railing in Ayodhya and worshiping it should not be considered a temple.
Ayodhya case LIVE: 'If Ram and Allah are not respected in the country, then the country will end'
Rajiv Dhawan is now cross-examining the petition of Gopal Singh Visharad. Dhawan said that Gopal Singh Visharad has said in his petition that we were worshiping since 1950, but on the complaint of the Muslim side, the then DM KK Nair had stopped the worship. Muslims used to offer Namaz there. This is being questioned. The manner in which the statue was placed on the night of 22–23 December is not correct according to Hindu law. Dhawan said the testimony of 40 witnesses was not cross-examined.
Ayodhya case: Decision may come before the Chief Justice's retirement
Rajiv Dhawan said that information about Lord Ram's birthplace has not been given even in the petition of Gopal Singh Visharad. The birthplace is claimed to exist under the dome in the middle of the mosque and calls for the right to worship. Earlier on Monday, Rajiv Dhawan said that we believe that Rama was born there, but the Hindu side wants only temples there.
Ayodhya land dispute case: Supreme court to take a big decision on hearing this case