Bangalore: On Monday (February 8, 2022), the plea of Resham Farooq reached the Karnataka High Court for not getting admission wearing a burqa in Karnataka's PU College. reached menstruation. Arguing in the court, it was asked to keep even 'secular thinking' away from religious practices. In order to justify the demand of Muslim girls, advocate Devdutt Kamat, appearing for them, referred to the hadith given in the judgment of the Kerala High Court and said that it is not right for girls to stop their menstruation after they start their periods. Show any part of the body except the hand. The lawyer argued in the court that secular thinking does not determine what is permissible for religion and what is not. He said that religious practices should not be judged on the basis of secular considerations. At the same time, the Advocate General, appearing for the state, said about the demand made by the students in the High Court that even if the students want any kind of relaxation, they should approach the College Development Committee.
He said that he did not interfere in this matter because these powers have been given to the College Development Committee on his behalf to decide what will be the uniform of the children. Whereas, when the state opposed the petition, advocate Devdutt Kamat said that the government is not comfortable in this matter, so they are opposing this petition. His lawyer put forward certain articles of the constitution to get the girls allowed to wear the college burqa. Kamat argued that the burqa is protected under Article 19(1) of the freedom of expression. It can be banned only on the basis of Article 19(6). Kamat tried to prove the burqa by citing the judgments of the Madras, Bombay and Kerala High Courts to justify that it was a necessary religious practice as directed by the Quran. Kamat's side cited the Puttaswamy judgment of the apex court to justify the burqa. The counsel argued that wearing of burqa is an aspect of right to privacy which was recognized as part of Article 21 by the Puttaswamy judgment of the apex court.
Let us tell you that while hearing this matter today, the court had commented and said that keeping every sentiment aside, they will take a decision according to the constitution. Justice Krishna S Dixit had said that the Constitution is above the Bhagavad Gita and he will go by the oath he has taken in the name of the Constitution. During this hearing, the court ordered a copy of the Quran to understand the matter. After that further hearing started on that basis. On the question whether a burqa is necessary? It was told through the verses of the Qur'an that verses 24.31 and 24.33 talk of 'head scoff'. In these, it has been told how the part of the neck should not be visible to a man other than his husband. Now according to the information, the court will confirm the copy of Quran given to the judge in this case that it is the authentic version. The court said that he has full faith in the wisdom and virtue of the people. He hopes that his point will be taken in peace. Let us tell you that a video of this is also going viral, in which a girl student is seen going to college wearing a burqa and some students are raising slogans of Jai Shri Ram in front of her. At the same time, the student also raises the slogan of Allah Hu Akbar in response to this.
Suddenly a bus full of passengers became a fireball and then...
2000 people left Islam in this state of India, know what is the reason
Supreme Court directs IIT Madras to treat OCI student as local student for fee