The United States is resisting calls for a ceasefire during the United Nations Security Council's recent discussion on the conflict between Israel and Gaza. This marks the first open debate on the matter, where the majority of council members are urging for an immediate halt to hostilities, allowing humanitarian assistance to reach the beleaguered Palestinian population enduring relentless Israeli airstrikes in Gaza.
The Security Council, comprised of 15 members, with veto power held by the five permanent members including the United States and Russia, has thus far been unable to produce a resolution capable of bringing an end to the violence. Last week, the United States, a staunch supporter of Israel, exercised its veto to block a resolution supported by 12 other council members. This resolution sought a temporary cessation of hostilities but was vetoed due to perceived inadequacy in highlighting Israel's right to self-defense. A prior resolution drafted by Russia also faced rejection.
The debate featured representatives from nearly 90 countries, including approximately 30 foreign ministers and deputy ministers. Many of them echoed the calls for an immediate ceasefire, emphasizing the need to stop attacks on Palestinian civilians amidst the widespread devastation in Gaza and the rising death toll.
Egypt's Foreign Minister, Sameh Shoukry, expressed regret over the Security Council's failure to pass a resolution or even make a clear call for a ceasefire to end the conflict. Jordan's Foreign Minister, Ayman Safadi, speaking on behalf of the 22-member Arab Group at the UN, accused Israel of devastating Gaza and lamented the Security Council's inability to demand an immediate ceasefire. Safadi urged diplomats to adopt a resolution that not only stops the war but also condemns civilian casualties on both sides and prevents the suffering and collective punishment of the Palestinian population.
He emphasized that the Security Council must take a firm stance to reassure the two billion Arabs and Muslims that international law will be upheld. In contrast, the United States has expressed a preference for a humanitarian pause, a less formal and shorter alternative to a full ceasefire.
Read More Updates:
US State Official Resigns in Protest of Biden's Approach to Israel-Gaza Conflict
Israel-Gaza Conflict Sparks Heightened Alert in the United States
Israel-Hamas Conflict Enters 19th Day: A Global War for Freedom?