Review of the Netflix original series Depp v. Heard: Considerate new series flogs a dead horse and treats Johnny Depp and Amber Heard like zoo animals

The cinematic equivalent of armchair journalism, Netflix’s new Depp v Heard documentary series is typically well-produced, but frustratingly shallow.

One would imagine that only newly unearthed evidence, or a fresh perspective, or even a touch of empathy could inspire the re-litigation of such a recent public feud.

But the three-part series offers little else besides a bland summary of the entire case, and that, too, after having taken a rather questionable stance on it.

Try as hard as director Emma Cooper might to appear unbiased, but certain editing choices betray her inner sympathies. No prizes for guessing what side the series seems to be leaning towards, but when one of the involved parties is introduced as a swashbuckler and the other a vixen, it leaves little room for ambiguity.

Of course, it’s completely understandable for these biases — which might be subconscious, for all we know — to have crept into the show, because it isn’t like the jury is still out on the case. But it certainly deserved a more nuanced telling than this.

In 2018, actor Amber Heard wrote an op-ed for the Washington Post, in which she claimed to have experienced professional and personal consequences for having spoken out publicly about the alleged abuse that she had suffered in a past relationship.

After her article, not taking her ex-husband Johnny Depps name, he sued her for defamation. This followed a UK trial where Depp had lost a case against a journalist and newspaper for labeling him a wife-beater, confirming his violence towards Heard in their marriage. He filed a 50 million lawsuit against her

The trial was conducted in Virginia, not because either Depp or Heard had homes there, but because the Washington Post has servers in the state. This is one of the few intriguing insights that the show provides Heard wanted the trial to take place in California, which was home base for both her and Depp, but he insisted on Virginia because it has tighter libel laws.

More arm-twisting such as this must’ve surely unfolded in backrooms, but the series is mainly concerned with the circus that the trial eventually became — people camped outside the courthouse like they were Directioners desperate to catch a glimpse of Harry Styles — because Depp insisted that cameras be allowed to record the proceedings.

Next : These 7 Prominent Indian Cricketers Hold High-Ranking Government Positions
Read More