A Decade of Dominance: How One Community Controlled Haryana and Ignored the Rest
A Decade of Dominance: How One Community Controlled Haryana and Ignored the Rest
Share:

For those who have observed Haryana's political landscape over the past decade, it may be hard to imagine that there was once a time when the state was notorious for corruption and discrimination under Congress rule. During Bhupinder Singh Hooda's tenure, the state government appeared to favor one particular community, leading to widespread inequality and an oppressive environment for others.

Discriminatory Practices and Community Bias:

Under Congress rule, a specific community was given undue preference, while others faced severe discrimination and inequality. Jobs were often awarded to those who could pay the highest bribes, reflecting a "kharchi-parchi" system that became embedded in the state's administration. This favoritism meant that key opportunities and resources were predominantly reserved for this favored community, leaving others systematically marginalized.

Economic and Social Impact:

The dominance of this community led to significant economic disadvantages for those not in its favor. Even when jobs were available, preference was given to members of the favored community, exacerbating economic disparities. This created an environment of frustration and disenchantment among other communities, who felt increasingly excluded and economically disadvantaged.

Law Enforcement and Governance Failures:

The situation was further aggravated by the leniency shown towards the favored community. Members of this group were shielded from legal repercussions, with law enforcement and administrative authorities often too intimidated to take action, even in cases of serious crimes. This impunity allowed members of this community to act with impunity, further alienating and oppressing other groups.

Atmosphere of Fear and Insecurity:

The pervasive atmosphere of fear and helplessness deeply affected the daily lives of those not aligned with the favored community. Many felt powerless to seek justice or protection from the administration, leading to a general sense of insecurity and disillusionment.

Impact on Women and Families:

The oppressive environment also had dire consequences for women and girls in Haryana. With an atmosphere of violence and insecurity, many were forced to remain confined to their homes, deprived of opportunities and independence. The lack of a safe and secure environment severely limited their prospects and freedoms.

Political Dominance and Social Disintegration:

During this period, the Hooda government was perceived as catering exclusively to the interests of one community, leading to what some described as a form of 'Gundaraj.' The social fabric of Haryana was damaged, with the rest of the population systematically sidelined and disenfranchised. This era marked a significant decline in governance and social equity, with lasting impacts on Haryana's political and social landscape.

Land Scams Under Congress Rule Hinder Congress's Return in Haryana

AAP Announces 21 More Candidates for Haryana Assembly Elections

 

Share:
Join NewsTrack Whatsapp group
Related News