New Delhi: Recently, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Ranjan Gogoi had asked all the parties in the Ayodhya Ram temple and Babri Masjid case to complete their arguments by October 18. After the debate of the Muslim side in that background, the Hindu side has to give its answer by Thursday evening. In this order, after the arguments of two Hindu parties within 20 minutes of the Ayodhya case hearing on Thursday, on the 36th day, when Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi told the lawyer of Nirmohi Akhara that you have time for one and a half hours.

On this statement of the CJI, the lawyer of the arena, Sushil Jain has said that the hearing is going on like a T-20 match. On this, CJI Gogoi expressed his displeasure and said how are you talking in the court. Actually, Chief Justice Gogoi expressed his displeasure and said how are you talking when Nirmohi Akhara's lawyer Sushil Jain compared the hearing to T-20. The CJI said that we have heard you in 4-5 days in detail, yet you are giving such statements.

Seeing CJI in anger, Sushil Jain regretted his statement. Earlier, advocate P Narasimha, appearing on behalf of Ramlalala Virajaman, had quoted Skanda Purana saying that Sri Ram's birth place is also mentioned in Skanda Purana and it has been the belief of Hindus that there is salvation from darshan here. The evidence of archeology department also confirms our belief.