The court has expressed regret over this mentality of the father who refused to take responsibility of his daughter. The court has said that when there was a mutual dispute between the husband and wife, then why did the husband select the son to be with him. The court has termed the idea of the difference between son and daughter in the 21st century as a blot on the mentality of the society.

The court of Rohini-based Additional Sessions Justice Swarnakanta Sharma made this remark while disposing of the petition filed by husband and wife against each other in this case. The court has slammed her husband in this case and said that he can drive two expensive cars himself during this time of corona and recession. But his business stalled in giving alimony to his wife and daughter. He is showing an inability to give 20 thousand rupees as compensation for his daughter and has brought a recommendation to reduce this amount in the court.

His income tax and property-related details show that he is living a life of luxury in a tremendous place with his son. But his business has come to a standstill to pay for the daughter's well-being and he is fascinated by the pie. But the court has also come with an expensive car. The court said that this is very embarrassing. The court has ordered this person to pay Rs. 20 thousand per month as alimony to the daughter and wife.

Also Read:

How 18 Year old Became a Serial Entrepreneur Vishal Shinde

Tulsi is a healing herb, add it to your diet to get these amazing health benefits

Tasty and healthy keto coffee recipe to speed up your fat-burning process

PM Modi inaugurates Ro-Pax' Ferry Service in Gujarat