On the day of Vijay Mallya, a fugitive businessman from India, some news comes. He is accused of fraud of 9 thousand crores. Due to this allegations, on Wednesday, the British High Court reached in connection with its appeal against the order of extradition to India. The fugitive from Kingfisher Airlines escaped from reporters at the entrance of the business court and went inside with his lawyer. He has been out on bail since his arrest in April 2017 over an extradition warrant.
Outbreak of locust terror continues, UN says this in a warning tone
According to the media report, earlier in July this year, a bench of the High Court of Justice George Leggett and Justice Andrew Popwell arranged that prima facie arguments on the matter related to the decision of Chief Magistrate Emma Arbuthnot in December 2018. Justice Leggett had said that to a large extent, the most notable premise is that the senior district judge was wrong in arriving at the conclusion that the (India) government had prima facie decided the case.
Coronavirus: IWhen police refused to celebrate birthday, this person did terrible act
Mallya's lawyer Clare Montgomery was questioned on the basis on which the Chief Magistrate Arbuthnot came to the conclusion and claimed that the Chief Magistrate had mistaken in accepting the Indian government's plea that Mallya had given up his (now closed) Kingfisher. When he had asked for some loan for the airlines, his intention was to commit fraud and in connection with the loan. He had given false facts and his intention to return the loan. Other restrictions have also been imposed on him. He cannot go out of the country till the hearing continues.
