Nepal's Prime Minister KP Oli is known for his anti-India stance on the instigation of China. On Monday, Oli issued a disputed statement in the case of Lord Ram and Ayodhya. Yesterday Nepal's Foreign Ministry, while clarifying on PM KP Oli's remarks on Ayodhya and Lord Ram, said that the comment is not related to any political case. There is no desire to hurt anyone's feelings. Its purpose is not to reduce the symbolic and cultural value of Ayodhya.

In an event sponsored at the Prime Minister's House in Kathmandu on Monday, PM Oli had said that Ayodhya is actually in Thori district, west of Birbhum city of Nepal. The country claims that Lord Ram's birth took place there. Due to this constant claim, we have started to believe that Goddess Sita was married to Prince Rama of India but Ayodhya is actually a village near Birbhumi. While accusing the country of cultural encroachment, Oli had said that the country has created a fake Ayodhya.

In his address, he claimed that Balmiki's residence is in Nepal. The holy place where King Dasaratha performed a havan for the birth of a son. Dasaratha's son Ram was not an Indian and Ayodhya is also located in Nepal. Oli gave a strange argument on these claims and said that when there was no medium of communication, how did Lord Ram come to Janakpur to marry Sita? He also claimed that it was not possible for Lord Ram that he would have come from present Ayodhya to Janakpur in India.

Also Read-

Corona wreaks havoc in Brazil, many new cases surfaced

Another meeting between Nepal PM KP Oli and Executive President Prachanda cancelled

Trump's attack on China, steps taken for Hong Kong Autonomy Act