NEW DELHI: Supreme Court questioned on Friday whether one of the parties involved in the politically sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case, Ram Lala Virajman, is still residing in Ayodhya. A five-judge bench headed by CJI Ranjan Gogoi questioned the question of senior advocate Parasaran appearing for Ram Lala Virajman.

"We are only wondering if a man of the Raghuvansh dynasty is still living in Ayodhya. The bench said that the question is being asked inquisitively. "I am not aware of it," Parasaran replied. We will try to find out. The Supreme Court is now hearing the Ayodhya case every day. On the fourth day of the hearing, Parasaran was answering questions from the Supreme Court on how 'birth place of god) could be treated as a 'judicial person'.

"In Hinduism, it is not necessary to consider the same place as a temple where the statues are located. Hindus do not worship the gods in any course, but they worship them as divine incarnations which have no certain form. The hearing in the case will continue on August 13. Earlier, during Thursday's hearing, Rigveda, Shlok, River was mentioned, while the Supreme Court judges were listening to the lawyers of Nirmohi Akhara and deity.

Also Read:

Section 370: Terrorist Masood Azhar says PM Modi accepted his defeat

Three Karnataka BJP MLAs demand this from CM Yeddyurappa

Congress President to be announced by this evening: Chhattisgarh CM Bhupesh

Prayer meeting held for Sushma Swaraj, daughter paid tribute