Recently, the Supreme Court's decision has been taken in the issue of women entering the Sabarimala temple located in Kerala. As they said, there has been strong opposition to the massive protests following the decision of a 5 -member constitution bench to allow entry of women between the age of 10 to 50.
The court has said that when the court gives a verdict, all have to follow whether it is the PM or the CM. The same justices Rohinton F. Nariman and Justice DY Chandchur have not agreed to the majority to refer the matter to a 7-member bench stating that whoever does not work to support our decision. As far as the Union and State Ministers and MPs and MLAs are concerned, if they do so, they will violate the Constitutional Oath to uphold and protect the Constitution of India. According to the information received, in this decision written by Justice Nariman, it is said that it is permissible to have healthy criticism about the verdict, even if that decision is of the largest court of the country but our constitution does not allow to encourage people to thwart the decision of the Supreme Court
Madhya Pradesh: Congress MLA Bisahu Lal Singh is taking wheat in one rupee kg, revealed in RTI
Justice Nariman has directed the Kerala government to give wide publicity to this decision through television, newspapers etc. At the same time, the government should take steps to win the trust of the people, and to implement the decision of the court, after deliberating on a broad basis, the modalities should be made. In the process of this discussion, things of all sections of the community will be considered carefully. The same Justice Nariman said, When the legal process is complete, then the verdict is pronounced. This is the decision of the Supreme Court and it is binding on all. Not following the decision is not an option. If such an option were to occur, the authority of the court compelled to comply with the verdict should be reduced.
Gold is being smuggled from Myanmar to India, four arrested so far
According to the sources, he said, "Once it is clearly understood that the rule of law has been established, the greed of the vote or the political parties inciting or tolerating mob violence go against the Supreme Court's decision of the rule. It is not the way. He also said that it is necessary for all authorities to implement the decision of this Court under the Constitution. Justice Nariman said, there will be no compromise in this. The duty to do so arises because it is necessary to preserve the rule of law. He has said that no individual or authority will be allowed to openly flout the decision or order of the Supreme Court.
Here's how you can identify adulterated milk, Know here!