New Delhi: Public interest litigation was filed in the Supreme Court demanding imposition of President's rule in Uttar Pradesh. At the same time, the petition has been rejected by the court. CJI SA Bobde said in the meantime that 'the petitioner has not done any research in this regard'. In this case, the petitioner says, 'Law and order in UP are bad. NCRB data also shows that criminal cases against women are more in UP.' In fact, this petition was filed in the Supreme Court by CR Jayasukin, a lawyer from Tamil Nadu. The petition cited the Hathras case as saying that "fundamental rights are being violated in UP, so President's rule should be imposed."

In the same sequence, during the hearing, the apex court told the petitioner that, "If we argue more, we will impose a heavy fine." In fact, CR Jayasukin had said in his petition, "There is outrage across the country over the alleged rape and murder of the woman in Hathras." Demonstrations have been held in many places in the country. The gang-rape victim in Hathras, 20, died on September 29, 2020, at Safdarjung Hospital in Delhi. This incident shook the entire nation. This incident, which crossed the limits of cruelty, took place on 14 September in Hathras, UP.

In such a situation, now the Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court said that 'a cruelty was shown by the criminals with the victim and what happened after that, if it is true, is like sprinkling salt on their wounds rather than removing the grief of their family. The dead body should be taken to their home, but it was not done.' In the Hathras case, the Supreme Court has also constituted a committee headed by retired Judge Justice BS Chauhan to investigate. The investigation of the case has now been handed over to the CBI.

Also Read:-

In Rajya Sabha, PM Modi says 'Fufi also gets angry in marriage'

Uddhav government will conduct investigation against Bollywood celebs tweets on farmers' protest

Uttarakhand glacier disaster: Team of scientists will go to tunnel to collect details