New Delhi: 'PM Modi considers Sikhs as second class citizens in India'. This was the statement of former Congress President Rahul Gandhi in Britain, a few days after this Khalistanis attacked the Indian Embassy in Britain and also insulted India's national flag tricolor. It is not being said here that the Khalistanis attacked because of Rahul Gandhi's statement, but the anti-India forces could definitely use this statement of Rahul as a weapon to provoke the Sikhs, or it could be that Have done Remember, when Rahul Gandhi made a statement against Article 370, which was used by Pakistan against India in the United Nations. Pakistan had said that, 'After the removal of Article 370, Rahul Gandhi had mentioned the death of people in Jammu and Kashmir'. At that time, India had to be ashamed of the statement of its own leader.
Even in the 'Saare Modi Chor Hain' case, the Surat court had told Rahul Gandhi that, 'You are an MP, you should speak responsibly because your words have a wider impact.' But, meanwhile, the question is also arising whether Rahul could have got relief in this matter. Definitely could have got it, if he had apologised. Because, even before this, the court has given relief to him on apologizing three times and most of the defamation cases end like this. If you have not said anything wrong, then prove it in the court, or if you have said something wrong in excitement, then apologize by expressing regret. Similarly, CM Kejriwal also ended the case by apologizing in the defamation case. He accused Union Minister Nitin Gadkari of corruption, Gadkari challenged him to prove corruption in the court. Kejriwal found nothing to prove his allegation and tendered an unconditional apology. Similarly, Kejriwal also apologized to Kapil Sibal. Not only this, Rahul Gandhi himself has apologized thrice in the court, but what happened this time?
Perhaps Rahul Gandhi's lawyers advised him this time not to apologize and that's why the Congress leader got caught in this case and now because of this he became ex-MP from MP. Explain that, according to the order of the Supreme Court, if any MP or MLA is convicted by a court and sentenced to 2 years or more, then the membership of that public representative ends with immediate effect. In such a situation, the membership of Rahul Gandhi had ended at the same time when he was sentenced by the Surat court. Only the order of the Supreme Court was complied with by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha.
Chowkidar is a thief but had to apologize :-
Let us inform that, during the campaign for the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, Rahul Gandhi had said in a speech regarding the Rafale deal case that, now even the Supreme Court has accepted that, 'There is a scam in the Rafale deal and the watchman is a thief'. ' On this matter, the Supreme Court strongly reprimanded Rahul Gandhi that, you cannot tell such lies in the name of the court. After which Rahul had expressed regret on his statement. Rahul had also said not to quote anything from the court in future, which has not been said by the court. For that, Rahul Gandhi presented an apology thrice in the Supreme Court. In the 22-page second affidavit, Rahul finally tendered an unconditional apology by filing a third affidavit after the apex court took a strong stand on the word 'sorry' being written in brackets at one place. But, this time he refused to apologize both in the House and in the court and he was punished, due to which his membership was also lost.
EU: Avoid using high-power appliances in the evening including washing machines and microwaves
The head of the school resigned after calling Ukrainian refugees "privileged robbers."
