On Tuesday, the leading organization, which is protesting against the entry of women of all ages into the Sabarimala temple, which opened before the Makar Vilakku festival, said that it would not allow women to enter at all. He said that in order to avoid hurting the religious sentiments of the people, he will keep a strict vigil on the temple and its surroundings.
BJP MP says Rahul Gandhi is foolish, because of this he breaks the dignity of language
On this special occasion, the All India Sabarimala Action Council said on Monday that it was satisfied that during the Mandalam festival held on December 27, no women aged 10 to 50 years could enter the temple of Lord Ayyappa. Council General Secretary SJR Kumar said that the tradition and customs of the temple will be saved at any cost.
Rahul Gandhi busy in meeting with Congress ministers, Wasim Rizvi says- "Rahul accept Islam"
In the year 2019, Sabarimala temple located in Kerala was covered in controversies. The entry of women from the age of 10 to 50 years was banned in the Sabarimala temple. The matter reached the Supreme Court regarding this ban. The court, in its decision, pronounced the decision to remove the ban on women going to the temple. There was a lot of controversy after this decision. Several review petitions were filed regarding the verdict. After the verdict, violence also took place in Kerala in many places. Hearing on review petitions in January
If firecrackers are rescued on New Year, then be ready for this situation
A large bench of seven judges will now hear in January 2020 on the review petitions reviewing the Supreme Court's decision on the controversy over the Sabarimala temple. A review petition has been filed challenging the decision to allow women of all age groups to enter the Sabarimala temple. Please tell that the Supreme Court had given the right of women of all ages to enter the temple in the previous decision. However, 60 petitions were filed to review this decision. On February 6, 2019, a five-judge bench headed by Supreme Court Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi reserved its order on these petitions.
