Patna: Preparations for the consecration of the grand Shri Ram temple in Ramnagari Ayodhya are at their peak. On the one hand, the work of distributing Akshat invitations from door to door of Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) has started from today to give information about Pran Pratistha. On the other hand, controversial statements regarding this are also ongoing. Meanwhile, a poster has been put up by the ruling Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) in Patna, the capital of Bihar. In this poster, the temple has been called a path to mental slavery.

Many types of posters have been put up outside the house of Lalu-Rabri Yadav; among these posters, there is one such poster in which the temple has been described as the path of mental slavery. It is written in that poster, 'Temple means the path of mental slavery and school means the path of light in life. When the temple bell rings, it gives us the message that we are moving towards superstition, hypocrisy, stupidity, and ignorance, and when the school bell rings, we get the message that we are moving towards rational knowledge, scientificity, and light. Are. Now decide which way you should go? Savitri Bai Phule'. Actually, RJD is organizing a program on January 7 in Rohtas on the birth anniversary of Savitri Bai Phule, which is going to be inaugurated by Bihar Education Minister Dr. Chandrashekhar. Let us tell you that this Education Minister of Bihar Chandrashekhar is infamous for his anti-Hindu comments. Chandrashekhar had even said that Ram was not Maryada Purushottam, rather Maryada Purushottam was Prophet Mohammed. Earlier, he had also described Ramcharitmanas as a book that spreads hatred. Actually, the Muslim-Yadav factor has been the main vote bank of RJD in Bihar. In such a situation, the party is always accused of insulting Hindu religion to woo Muslim voters, but wouldn't Yadav be angry with such statements of RJD leaders? Because Yadavs also consider themselves descendants of Shri Krishna and there is no difference between Ram and Krishna.

If Lalu goes to the temple with his family, will they become mental slaves?

Well, whether to go to the temple or not is a personal decision of every person. But the poster put up by his party RJD outside the Lalu family cannot be put up without his consent. In that poster the temple has been described as a path to mental slavery. But if you look at some of the previous visits of RJD supremo Lalu Yadav himself, he has also been seen roaming from temple to temple along with his family. So in such a situation would it be appropriate to call Lalu Yadav and his family mental slaves? In August 2023, Lalu along with his wife Rabri Devi had reached his native village Phulwariya, where he offered prayers at the Durga temple. In September 2023, Lalu Baba had come to visit Vaijnath Jyotirlinga. In October 2023, Lalu had gone to Banke Bihari Shiv Temple with his daughters and offered prayers. In December 2023, Lalu had gone to visit Tirupati Balaji temple with his entire family including Tejashwi-Tej Pratap.

Apart from this, in 2023, Lalu has been seen visiting Thawe of Gopalganj, Siddhi Vinayak of Mumbai and Hariharnath temple of Sonpur, then will RJD leaders be able to call their party president a 'mental slave'? Or is this a trick of RJD, through which it can instigate people, this will create two groups of people going to the temple and those opposing it and then it will be easier to bake electoral bread on those pieces. Because, if the national president of a party whose national president is going to the temple every month puts up a poster in front of his house that temples are a symbol of slavery, then what can be understood from this? Would Lalu not have seen the posters put up in front of his house?

Critics also say that this is an agenda of the opposition parties, so that they can convert Hindus into votes by dividing them into pieces. Caste census is also a part of this, because the opposition knows very well that as long as Hindus are voting as Hindus, it is not easy to defeat BJP, so this unity of Hindus should be broken in any way. Because they have been getting Muslim votes outright since the beginning, if 20-25 percent Hindus also get angry and convert into votes, then the path to power can become easy. Critics say that this is the reason due to which the opposition leaders, whether it is the anti-Sanatan speech of Udayanidhi Stalin, whether it is Rahul Gandhi's separation of Hindu and Hindutva, or the anti-Hindu statements of RJD leaders. Everyone is part of the same mission. Rahul Gandhi has also said in a statement that people going to temples tease girls. Critics argue to prove their point, have you seen any opposition leader commenting about any other religion (other than Hindu)? Because, casteism is there in every religion, even in Islam there are 73 sects, all of them have some opposition towards each other, among Christians also there are many branches like Catholic, Protestant, Jehovah Witness, in which they do not even marry each other. . But, the leaders remain silent there because it is not their target.

BSF Thwarts Drone Threat: Downed 100+ Drones, Apprehended 37 Smugglers in 2023

BJP's Ongoing Minority Outreach: Fifty Christian Families Align with the Party in Kerala

Myanmar Soldiers Seek Refuge in Mizoram Amid Ongoing Clashes