New Delhi: Tesla directors have reached a groundbreaking settlement, agreeing to pay a staggering $735 million to address claims of self-enrichment through overpaid stock options. The momentous resolution, announced on Monday, comes as a result of a 2020 lawsuit filed by the Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit.
The lawsuit put forth serious allegations, accusing the directors, including the company's CEO, Elon Musk, of granting themselves exorbitant and unjustifiable compensation in the form of approximately 11 million stock options between 2017 and 2020. The crux of the issue lay in the timing of these options, awarded during a period of relatively low Tesla stock prices, only to vest when the stock prices soared to substantially higher levels.
The court-approved settlement mandates the return of the equivalent value of 3.1 million Tesla stock options by the directors. Additionally, the directors will be required to disburse $10 million to cover attorneys' fees.
Also read: Norwegian Data Protection Authority Puts Pressure on Meta, Threatening Daily Fines over Data Privacy
Michael Barr, the lead attorney representing the plaintiffs, declared the settlement a resounding victory for shareholders, sending a clear message that directors cannot exploit their positions for personal gain at the expense of shareholders' interests.
It's worth noting that Tesla, in the settlement, did not admit any wrongdoing and maintained that the directors acted in good faith, serving the best interests of Tesla stockholders.
Also read: SoftBank’s 7 Million Dollar Office Delivery to get done by Cute Little Robots
This landmark settlement stands as one of the largest ever reached for a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the esteemed Court of Chancery, which holds great significance as a major venue for shareholder-related litigations. It represents yet another legal challenge faced by Tesla, with Elon Musk having settled a lawsuit with the SEC in 2021 over tweets related to taking Tesla private. The company is currently embroiled in a securities fraud investigation by the Department of Justice (DOJ).
Also read: EU's Ambitious AI Act Receives Cautious Reception in Asia, Sparking Global Regulation Debate
Beyond its immediate implications for Tesla, this settlement sets a significant precedent for other corporations. It demonstrates the willingness of shareholders to pursue legal action against directors believed to prioritize personal gain over shareholder welfare. Moreover, it underscores the courts' readiness to hold directors accountable for their actions.
The ramifications of this historic settlement are far-reaching, marking a pivotal moment in corporate governance and reminding companies of the imperative to prioritize the interests of their shareholders above all else.
