The state government has filed an application in the Allahabad High Court to defer the hearing in the case of hoardings and posters with photographs of those accused of causing damage to property during violence in protest against the Citizenship Amendment Act. With this, due to the strike on Monday, it could not be heard. Apart from this, the Uttar Pradesh government has filed an application to postpone the hearing from the Allahabad High Court based on the SLP of the state government and the ordinance issued by the state government. In addition, a division bench of Chief Justice Govind Mathur and Justice Ramesh Sinha directed the immediate removal of the posters, terming the photo displayed in public places as a violation of the right to privacy. On March 16, the petition was ordered to be disposed of on filing the affidavit along with the compliance report.
Husband and wife got divorced due to coronavirus, you will be shocked to know the whole thing
The state government has challenged this order in the Supreme Court. Which has been sent to the larger bench. Along with this, the state government has issued an ordinance validating the posting of posters and has found a way to avoid complying with the court order. By not filing the compliance report, the government has demanded additional time for filing the affidavit. Allahabad High Court directed the state government to submit a compliance report on March 16 in the case of posting photo hoardings and posters of accused of committing violence and sabotage in a dozen cities of the state, including Lucknow, against the Citizenship Amendment Act.
Uttar Pradesh's Yogi Adityanath government was directed by the Allahabad High Court to remove the hoardings and posters containing photographs of all the accused of violent demonstrations against the CAA by 16 March. Had also summoned Along with this, the Allahabad High Court Chief Justice Govind Mathur, taking automatic cognizance of the case of hoardings and posters, ordered the posters to be removed on Sunday, March 9 and to submit a compliance report on March 16. The Supreme Court had reached against his instruction. The double bench of the Supreme Court did not stay the High Court order there, but the matter was referred to the larger bench.
Mamata angry at cancellation of Kolkata ODI, says, "Why did Ganguly not tell us?"
