On Tuesday, the Delhi High Court turned down an application challenging the suspension of telecom services in several areas of the national capital during protests during the CAA Act. It was alleged that this step was against the rules. Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Jain told Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice C Hari Shankar that services were stopped for only four hours on December 19 and the order is no longer in effect.
Akhilesh Yadav targets government on NPR after CAA, accuses PM of hiding report
After hearing his plea, the court refused to hear further on this application. Jain also said that no rules have been broken in this case. The High Court said that if any person has suffered any loss due to this prohibition, then he can bring suit for compensation. In this case, the petitioner SFLAC.in had claimed that this step is a violation of digital rights and freedom.
This bench of Delhi High Court also refused to immediately issue an order on an application of the BJP leader in the Jamia violence case, in which BJP leader Ashwini Upadhyay said that because of this violence, about 20 There has been loss of property worth crores of rupees and it should be repaid to the people responsible for it. Apart from this, strict action against those who disturb peace in the country. A petition seeking an order of Y went filed Tuesday in the Supreme Court. A petitioner, Puneet Kumar Dhanda, said that identification of political parties that are spreading lies and rumors in the name of citizenship law and strict action should be ordered against them.
Owaisi targets Union Home Minister, says "Amit Shah sahib, till the sun rises from the east…"
