In the UN Security Council, India can not be permanent members due to Nehru's policies and stubbornness. Once again, China saved Jaish-e-Mohammad from being declared an International Terrorist. If Jawaharlal Nehru, who was passionate about China, had accepted the advice of Sardar Patel, then today he would join the permanent members of the Security Council. Today, the Government of India is working hard for permanent membership of the UN Council and there are also five permanent members of the Security Council, which is active since 1971. China has ever used its veto in favor of the Pakistani terrorist Masood Azhar, and at the same time, on the strength of such privilege, nobody is excited to get the NSG membership to India. But the truth is that due to the policies of Nehru, India could not be formed, a permanent member of the Security Council, you should know about this in detail when Sardar Patel did say much but Nehru did not say it.
India could not become permanent member of the Security Council

also read A toddler shot dead looking through the window of his residence

It is to be noted that in the year 1956,US President J. F. Kennedy wanted to give India permanent membership of the Security Council, because in Asia, the Communist wanted to strengthen India against China. But the first Prime Minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru, rejected this proposal due to his global non-alignment, and he was so engrossed towards China that he had requested China to enter the Security Council in place of India. The charter is that Sardar Patel had advised Nehru not to believe in China completely before the year, but Nehru did not believe it. 

While on November 7, 1950, a month before Sardar Patel was due to die, he wrote a letter to warn Nehru about China, in which he wrote, "In the last few months, apart from Russian attitude, we are alone in the world. , Who has supported China's entry into the United Nations and has protected her (China) from the American pledge on the issue of Famorsa (Taiwan). With the US-UK and in the United Nations, we have protected China's rights and feelings in both dialogue and correspondence. Even after this, China's suspicion on us makes it clear that China considers us an enemy. I do not think we can show more generosity towards China. "

also read This girl is the weakness of Tapsee Pannu, any guesses?

However, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor has written in one of his book 'Nehru-The Invention of India' that the officials who saw the relevant documents confirmed this and Nehru gave this place to China. On March 11, 2015, Anton Hunter of the International History Department of the London School of Economics wrote in 'Not at the Cost of China' that Nehru and his sister published the correspondence between Vijay Lakshmi Pandit (who was India's ambassador to America) In this, Nehru has clearly written that India is not interested in the permanent membership of the Security Council and that China should meet this place.

Patelje tried to stop Nehru very often when Sardar wrote a letter, then China's attack on Tibet was continuing and many rhetoric about China's Tibet was in progress. Patel considered Tibet's security as important for India's security. He wrote, "I have read carefully the correspondence between the Government of China and the Indian Ambassador and the Prime Minister, but I am unable to get the satisfaction concluded. The Chinese government tried to deceive us by declaring peaceful intentions. They succeeded in making the position of our ambassador in mind that China wants a peaceful solution to the Tibet case. There is no doubt that Chinese are preparing for a fierce attack on Tibet during this time of correspondence. The tragedy is that Tibetans believed in us but we could not save them from China's diplomacy and evil intentions.