Varanasi: Congress leader Pramod Krishnam has given a statement on the claims of getting Shivling in Gyanvapi Mosque of Varanasi. In fact, they say that the issue of Gyanvapi is related to faith and public sentiments of India and is under consideration in the court, but the question is why the Shivling was hidden till now and who has hidden it? In fact, recently Congress leader Pramod Krishnam said that, 'The direct does not need proof, whatever the order of the judiciary will be, everyone will have to obey it.' Apart from this, Pramod Krishnam also said that, 'Qutub Minar and Taj Mahal are under the Government of India and are not associated with any religion, in such a situation the government should hand over the Taj Mahal and Qutub Minar to the Hindus, this subject to the Government of India. But we are with the nation and the country.
With this, he said on the protest of Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray going on in Ayodhya, 'BJP MP Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and Raj Thackeray are pieces of a plate.' During this, Congress Rajya Sabha MP Deependra Hooda, who was present with Pramod Krishnam, said that like Ram temple, the court will also take a decision on the Gyanvapi case. On the other hand, Minority Congress President Shahnawaz Alam has termed the order of the lower court of Banaras to seal the place after the alleged Shivling was found in the survey inside the Gyanvapi Mosque. In fact, Shahnawaz Alam alleged that the survey order of the district court was against the Place of Worship Act 1991.
Shahnawaz Alam claims that the stone in the middle of the old fountain meant for performing Wudhu in the mosque, which was broken later, is being spread as a broken Shivling. Apart from this, he said that almost all the old and big mosques in the country have such fountains and similar stones are installed in between them. In fact, Shahnawaz Alam said that the question arises whether in 1937 and 1942 this alleged Shivling, which the survey team is claiming to have discovered today, was not present there. And if it wasn't then, how did you get it today? The court did not see the presence of any Shivling in the cases of 1937 and 1942. Today, an illegal attempt is being made to change the situation on August 15, 1947 by spreading rumors of getting Shivling in the name of survey.