MONTEVIDEO, Uruguay: In a closely contested presidential runoff, left-wing opposition candidate Yamandú Orsi emerged victorious, defeating the conservative governing coalition and signaling a shift in Uruguay’s political landscape.
Despite the ongoing vote count, Álvaro Delgado, the candidate from the center-right ruling coalition, conceded the race and expressed his support for Orsi. “With sadness, but without guilt, we can congratulate the winner,” he said to his supporters in Montevideo.
As Orsi, 57, celebrated his win with a crowd of enthusiastic supporters, fireworks lit up the night sky. A former history teacher and two-time mayor of a local area, Orsi pledged to unite the nation of 3.4 million people after such a narrow victory. “The country of liberty, equality, and fraternity has triumphed once again,” he said.
With nearly all votes counted, Orsi secured just over 49% of the vote, narrowly surpassing Delgado’s 46%. The remaining votes were either blank or cast by those who abstained, reflecting the country’s compulsory voting system. Voter turnout reached nearly 90%.
The campaign leading up to the election was low-key, with little focus on anti-establishment sentiments seen in other countries, such as the United States or neighboring Argentina. Uruguay’s elections did not see the same populist movement that has driven outsiders into power elsewhere.
With Delgado’s concession, Orsi becomes Uruguay’s new president, ending the center-right Republican coalition’s hopes of maintaining power after the 2019 election of President Luis Lacalle Pou, which marked the end of 15 years of Broad Front rule.
With nearly all votes tallied, electoral officials announced that Orsi secured 49.8% of the vote, narrowly defeating Delgado, who garnered 45.9%. This result marked a clear victory for Orsi after weeks of polling suggesting the two contenders were neck-and-neck.
A notable portion of voters either submitted blank ballots or abstained, highlighting a growing dissatisfaction with the electoral process, despite Uruguay’s compulsory voting law. Voter turnout remained impressively high, with nearly 90% of the 2.7 million eligible voters participating.
Political analysts pointed to the lack of enthusiasm in the candidates' campaigns, which failed to resonate with young, apathetic voters and contributed to an unusually high level of indecision at the polls. The candidates’ failure to inspire strong support from younger demographics was one of the key factors in the lack of decisive engagement in the election.
However, despite the lackluster campaigns, the election results reflected Uruguay's broader political climate. Both candidates shared similar views on several crucial issues, leading to a more civil and pragmatic contest. This level-headed approach to governance stands in stark contrast to the populist fervor seen in other countries like the United States and Argentina. Uruguay's ability to hold such a stable, peaceful election is a testament to the strength of its democracy—one that remains resilient to the anti-establishment sentiments that have propelled populist movements elsewhere.