Controversy and inventiveness are frequently complementary in the world of Indian cinema. A controversy arose when the film "Mental Hai Kya," starring Kangana Ranaut and Rajkummar Rao, was titled "Mental Hai Kya," to which the Indian Psychiatric Society (IPS) took strong exception. The IPS claimed that the title went against multiple provisions of the Mental Health Care Act of 2017, citing worries about stigmatising those who suffer from mental illnesses. In reaction to the objections raised by the IPS, the filmmakers changed the title to "Judgmental Hai Kya." Discussions concerning how mental health is portrayed in the Indian film industry and the duty of filmmakers to handle delicate subjects were sparked by this action.
An important piece of legislation in India that aims to uphold the rights and dignity of people dealing with mental health issues is the Mental Health Care Act of 2017. Ensuring that individuals in need have access to mental healthcare, treatment, and rehabilitation is its main goal. It also attempts to stop the discrimination and stigmatisation of people who have mental illnesses.
Because they felt the title "Mental Hai Kya" promoted stigma and stereotypes related to mental health problems, the Indian Psychiatric Society had reservations about it. As per the IPS, the title perpetuated negative stereotypes and misrepresented the experiences of individuals living with mental health conditions by trivialising and making light of them. The responsibility of filmmakers as well as the potential impact of popular culture on public perceptions were called into question by this.
In many societies, stigmatisation of people with mental health disorders is a widespread issue. It influences these people's self-esteem and willingness to ask for assistance, in addition to how society views them. Therefore, the goal of the Mental Health Care Act of 2017 is to remove these obstacles, advance an inclusive society, and foster a positive outlook on mental health.
Public opinion and beliefs are significantly shaped by the media, including film. How mental health is portrayed in films has a big influence on how society perceives and handles people who suffer from mental illnesses. The IPS was concerned about "Mental Hai Kya" because of the possibility that the movie's title would reinforce negative stereotypes. They maintained that it is the moral duty of filmmakers to produce material that is considerate of the difficulties faced by those who are dealing with mental health concerns.
After receiving objections from the IPS, the film's creators decided to rename the movie from "Mental Hai Kya" to "Judgmental Hai Kya." The decision was made in light of the entertainment industry's willingness to have meaningful conversations and the growing awareness of how important it is to represent mental health issues responsibly in the media.
The public's responses to the title change were diverse. Some saw it as a step in the right direction towards addressing the issues brought up by the IPS and honouring the feelings of those who are living with mental illnesses. Others believed that the modification inhibited artistic expression and was needless. This response highlights how complicated the situation is and how careful balancing between artistic freedom and social responsibility is needed.
For any kind of artistic expression, creative freedom is essential. Filmmakers and other creatives frequently contend that limitations or censorship shouldn't apply to their work. While there is merit to this viewpoint, it is equally important to take into account the responsibility and social impact of their creations. This conflict between artistic freedom and social responsibility is best illustrated by the discussion surrounding "Mental Hai Kya" versus "Judgmental Hai Kya."
Filmmakers possess a distinctive ability to impact societal attitudes and increase consciousness regarding a range of matters, such as mental health. They have an obligation to handle delicate subjects with care and sensitivity, even though they should be free to explore complex themes and push boundaries. In this sense, the subject of mental health requires special consideration.
The film industry is being urged to acknowledge its influence over public opinion and to exercise that influence responsibly, as evidenced by the IPS's objection to the original title. One cannot undervalue the influence of film content on social attitudes in a nation like India, where millions of people watch and appreciate the rich cultural significance of motion pictures.
The debate over the film's title change from "Mental Hai Kya" to "Judgmental Hai Kya" brought attention to the relationship between artistic freedom, social responsibility, and how mental health is portrayed in Indian cinema. The film industry should keep pushing creative boundaries, but it also needs to think about how its output will affect society as a whole.
The Mental Health Care Act of 2017 and the Indian Psychiatric Society's objections highlight the need for a more responsible and nuanced approach to how mental health is portrayed in popular culture. In the end, this controversy is a helpful reminder that entertainment and the arts can and should challenge stereotypes, raise awareness, and build a society that is more accepting and compassionate. It promotes a wider discussion on the obligations of the entertainment sector, which can have a big impact on how we view and handle crucial societal issues like mental health.
Karthik Aaryan and Nushrat Bharucha Shine in Their Most Emotionally Charged Roles
Saif Ali Khan and Kajol's Unforgettable Partnership in 'Hameshaa'
