NEW DELHI: Rahul Gandhi, the leader of the Congress party, who was reappointed as a Member of Parliament in the Lok Sabha just a day ago, is poised to inaugurate the discussion pertaining to the no-confidence motion levied against the government helmed by Narendra Modi in the Lower House of the Parliament. As articulated by K Suresh, the chief whip of the Lok Sabha for the party, this event is scheduled for Tuesday.

A mere span of three days prior to this occurrence, the apex court, Supreme Court, intervened, and in the wake of this intervention, the conviction that held Rahul Gandhi culpable in the criminal defamation case related to the surname "Modi" was temporarily suspended. Thus, he resumed his mantle as a Member of Parliament in the Lok Sabha on the preceding Monday.

As the curtains rise on the three-day-long discourse that commences today within the chambers of the Lok Sabha, it is anticipated that Manipur will loom large in the proceedings, owing to the motion of no-confidence advanced by the opposition.

In the hallowed precincts of the Lok Sabha today, the focal point of deliberation shall be none other than the no-confidence motion. At the stroke of noon, this motion shall occupy the center stage. It is thus ordained that Rahul Gandhi shall lead the charge from the Congress' flank, taking up the mantle as the maiden speaker on this weighty motion. These proceedings were elucidated by none other than Suresh, the whip of the Lok Sabha hailing from the Congress party.

In a recent antecedent, specifically on the preceding Monday, Amit Shah, the Union Home Minister, avowed his willingness to engage in discussions concerning Manipur. In this pronouncement, he left no room for opacity, stating that the central administration harbors no veiled agendas. Furthermore, he extended the olive branch, offering to deliberate upon the subject on the 11th of August, contingent upon the concurrence of Mallikarjun Kharge, the Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha.

Elaborating on the matter at hand, the Union Minister issued a declaration, articulating the narrow purview of their concern—Manipur remains the singular focus. Evidently, the Prime Minister's voice has not resonated on this particular concern thus far. A steady chorus of appeals had been orchestrated, beckoning him to the parliamentary podium, where he could shed light on the intricate tapestry of Manipur's circumstances. Regrettably, this call has been met with evasion, a deliberate refusal to heed the opposition's entreaties. To counter this inertia, a motion for adjournment has been set in motion within the precincts of the Lok Sabha. It is acknowledged that the scales are tipped unfavorably in this arena, where numerical strength is concerned, yet the quest for insight into the Prime Minister's stance persists.

Crossing over to the Rajya Sabha, a ploy under Rule 267 has been discerned, indicative of a concerted effort to wield authority. This maneuver is poised to surface within the contours of the Rajya Sabha, wherein Manipur shall again take the center stage. However, within the realm of the Lok Sabha, a different trajectory unfurls. Here, the fulcrum is set upon a no-confidence motion, affording a distinctive platform for dialogue. These deliberations have been attested to by the Lok Sabha's chief whip from the Congress party.

In the crucible of discourse, the anomaly emerges—Prime Minister Modi has found voice on Manipur outside the hallowed halls of the Parliament, but within, his silence reigns. This dissonance, this dichotomy, between public proclamation and parliamentary address raises pertinent questions. The query persists—where lies the resonance of his words within the chambers? The lament echoes—within these walls, the silence remains unbroken, the issues unresolved.

Turning attention to a distressing video that surfaced, depicting the despicable spectacle of two women paraded naked in the heart of Manipur. On the 20th of July, the Prime Minister voiced his sentiments, echoing a sentiment of anguish and disgrace, a sentiment that resonated with the very essence of a civil society. Within this context, he delivered a solemn vow—none found culpable shall evade justice, the transgressors shall find no sanctuary.

A recurring motif surfaces—the opposition, since the inception of the monsoon session on the 20th of July, has fervently championed discussions under Rule 267 within the precincts of the Rajya Sabha. The passage of time has not dulled their fervor, their commitment to enkindling a dialogue surrounding the tumultuous events in Manipur. Evidently, the Rajya Sabha has been ensnared in a quagmire of contention since the session's initiation, ensnared by the thorny issue of Manipur's turmoil.

The crucible of Manipur's discord has simmered for a considerable span of three months, a cauldron of tension stirred by ethnic strife between the Meities and Kukis, two tribal communities. This maelstrom found its origins in the behest of the Manipur High Court, charging the state government with the task of mulling over the inclusion of one of these communities within the purview of Scheduled Tribes.

Govt is dealing with Manipur situation at ‘very mature level’, says AG

Hundreds Fleeing Ethnic and Communal Clashes Seek Refuge in West Bengal, Minister Firhad Hakim Says

Tragedy Strikes: Fatal Clashes Claim Lives and Homes Ablaze in Manipur's Unrest