The Supreme Court of India has said that equality does not mean that it cannot be classified. It is necessary that unequal people should be judged in an unequal way because if the people coming out of unequal circumstances are seen with the right to equality, then it will not be justified. However, the court said that this classification should not be arbitrary. It should stand the test of its symptoms and purpose within a group of people. This should be logical.

Hyderabad Nizam Property Case: Pakistan setback by UK court, will have to pay legal expenses

On this matter, a bench of Justice Deepak Gupta and Justice Suryakant stated these things as wrong and inappropriate for the rule of Bihar government to give weightage to the doctors who are working in government hospitals only in the recruitment of general medical officer. It was a matter of court who asked the Bihar government to consider the experience of working in the army hospital of Dr. Mita Sahai and to issue a new merit list in 2 months.

Parineeti Chopra expells as brand ambassador, Congress creates ruckus

The court said, in the Constitution, to provide medical care to the poor and needy people, besides the central and state governments, there is a hospital at the level of authority including corporation and Panchayati Raj Institute. Army Hospital is also part of this. So there is no point in ignoring the experienced people from such hospitals.

CAA: Police took tough steps, 65 people including SP leader are in a bad condition

Apart from this, it is not logical that the experience of army hospitals is different from the experience of working in a hospital of the Bihar government. The attempt to discriminate between the 2 is to hurt the character of our constitutional governance system.

MP Sadhvi Pragyasinh Thakur sat on a dharna for being denied seat in aircraft of her choice