Ayodhya Case: Diety Advocates Says, Statue not necessary to consider a place as Temple
Ayodhya Case: Diety Advocates Says, Statue not necessary to consider a place as Temple
Share:

New Delhi: Supreme Court is continuing its fourth day hearing in the Ayodhya Ram temple and Babri Masjid case today. A Constitution bench of the apex court is hearing it. On behalf of Ram Lal Virajman, the senior lawyer's osmosis took his stand. On the other hand, Advocate Rajeev Dhawan of the Muslim side asked the Supreme Court to clarify the position on the news of the five-day hearing in the case.

Dhawan said he is unable to attend the hearing every day like this, he will have to do a lot of research and read the case. The top court said that they had been heard and they would be replied to.  On the other hand, a lawyer from Ram Lalla Virajman said that it is not necessary to have an idol in a place to be treated as a temple. Hindus do not worship God in just one form. Giving the example of Kedarnath temple, he said there is no statue.

Parasaran further said that even in Hinduism, mountains are worshipped in the form of god. He cited before the court the example of the Orbiter in Tiruvannamalai and Chitrakoot.  Parasaran further said that Sriram was worshipped long before the statue was erected and the temple was set up in Ayodhya.

Also Read: 

Former President Pranab Mukherjee Awarded Bharat Ratna, Sonia-Rahul Give Ceremony a Miss

Land mafia Azam Khan is in fear of arrest, not coming Rampur for a month

Shiv Sena warns Pakistan, says Home Minister's first step placed in Kashmir, second to be placed in PoK

Delhi Police's Big Success, 9 members of Gangster Neeraj Bawana Gang Arrested

 

Join NewsTrack Whatsapp group
Related News