During the conflict in the Galvan Valley between the soldiers of India and China in the Corona period, the soldiers did not have weapons. The question flashed in the minds of all the people of the country, including Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, what was the reason that the soldiers did not carry weapons with them. Rahul Gandhi is the foreign minister S.K. Jaishankar has given the answer. He said that there is a long tradition (under the 1996 and 2005 agreements) not to use weapons during the deadlock.

It is important for you to know in detail what are the agreements under which the Chinese soldiers along with India do not keep arms on the Line of Actual Control (LAC) with China. Let us know how many agreements have been reached between the two countries regarding the boundaries and what these agreements mean for both the countries.

For your information, let us tell you that Foreign Minister S.K. Jaishankar mentions two agreements in this context, which took place in 1996 and 2005. However, five agreements were reached in 1993, 1996, 2005, 2012 and 2013 to resolve the boundary dispute between India and China. PV Narasimha Rao was the Prime Minister at the time of the 1993 agreement. This agreement was common, which fell out of the details due to subsequent agreements. Article 6 of the 1996 agreement states that neither side will fire within two km radius of the LAC. Also, dangerous chemical weapons, guns, explosions are not allowed in this area. According to the 2013 Border Defense Cooperation Agreement, if soldiers from both sides come face to face, then they will not use force and shoot or armed struggle. At the same time, the 2005 agreement is more a guiding principle from the point of view of resolving the boundary dispute.

Also Read: 

"PM Modi surrendered in front of China", says Rahul Gandhi

Know why World Refugee Day is celebrated world wide

Increasing cyber attacks in Australia, China is being suspected

UP bus dispute: Priyanka's personal secretary has no relief, will have to stay in jail now