The Supreme Court of India, while giving a unique verdict, said that it is not necessary to follow any legislation, procedure or precedent if it is for the good or the interest of the child. The top court said that the interest of the child is paramount. A bench of Justices UU Lalit, Justice Indu Malhotra and Justice Murari ordered the custody of the 12-year-old girl in the father's custody in a husband-wife case. The bench rejected the allegation of the girl's mother that the girl's father used to molest her. The mother said that allowing the girl to be with the father is not free from danger.

Big news for Goa citizens, these people will not get affected by CAA

The seriousness of the matter, the bench said in its decision after talking to the girl and her parents, we personally spoke to the girl and her parents. We believe that the minor girl is well aware of this and is definitely in a position to vote with whom she wants to be with and where she is well. The bench found that the girl studied in the seventh grade. He spoke of attachment to the father and clearly expressed his desire to be with the father.

Uttar Pradesh: SSP Vaibhav Krishna made a big claim, fake video going viral

If we talk about this matter, the father not only cared for food, education, etc. but also used to cooperate in the projects and activities of his school. The bench cited the Supreme Court's decision in the matter in 2008 that favored the child's comfort, satisfaction, moral and physical development, health, education, and a conducive environment. Justified the order giving custody to the father and allowing the mother to meet the child. The Delhi High Court also dismissed the mother's plea and relied on the report of three counselors. The report said that the girl liked the father's side. On looking at the DVD provided by the mother, Hicourt found that she does not accept the father's claim of molesting the child.

Powerful explosion in Russia, Video goes viral on social media