New Delhi: Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi has once again captured the spotlight with her bold and symbolic political gestures. After facing criticism for carrying a "Palestine" bag in Parliament, she introduced another controversial item—a bag with the slogan “Save Hindus in Bangladesh.” These acts have sparked widespread debate, with reactions ranging from admiration to sharp criticism.

The controversy began when Priyanka carried a bag adorned with the watermelon symbol, widely recognized as a mark of solidarity with Palestine. This came shortly after her meeting with a Palestinian diplomat. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) seized the moment to criticize her, accusing her of indulging in “appeasement politics” and seeking relevance after Congress's electoral setbacks.

Unfazed by the backlash, Priyanka fired back at her critics, calling their remarks “typical patriarchy.” In a bold statement, she said, “I will wear what I want,” emphasizing her autonomy and challenging societal norms. However, BJP spokesperson Amit Malviya escalated the attack, describing her actions as “crass communal virtue signaling” and alleging they were aimed at appeasing Muslim voters. He even went on to label her a bigger political liability than her brother, Rahul Gandhi.

Shortly after the “Palestine bag” incident, Priyanka introduced another statement piece—a bag advocating for the protection of Hindus in Bangladesh. This move shifted focus to the plight of the Hindu minority in Bangladesh, a community that has faced increasing persecution in recent years. Her gesture came at a time when religious tensions in the region are on the rise, adding another layer of complexity to the ongoing discourse.

Priyanka’s actions have drawn mixed reactions. Supporters applaud her for addressing both international and domestic issues through powerful symbolism, viewing it as a reflection of her commitment to global and local causes. Critics, however, see her gestures as polarizing and opportunistic, accusing her of playing identity politics to gain traction.

These symbolic acts demonstrate Priyanka Gandhi’s attempt to carve out her own space in Indian politics. Whether seen as strategic or divisive, her gestures underline the growing influence of symbolism in shaping political narratives in India. As she continues her political journey, it remains to be seen how such moves will impact her public image and electoral prospects.