New Delhi: The hearing on the petitions filed against the removal of 370 granting special state status to Jammu and Kashmir be sent to the big constitution bench or not? The Constitution Bench of five judges of the Supreme Court on Thursday reserved the decision in the matter of whether or not to deliver before the big Constitution Bench of seven or nine judges.

Raj Thackeray's son Amit enters in Maharashtra politics

A five-member constitution bench headed by Justice NV Ramana reserved the verdict after hearing the arguments of the petitioners and the central government. On behalf of the petitioners, Dinesh Dwivedi, Rajeev Dhawan, and Sanjay Parikh argued, while Attorney General KK Venugopal presented the side of the Modi government. Earlier, while opening the hearing, Mr. Venugopal has argued that the separatists have been raising the issue of the referendum there because he wanted to make Jammu and Kashmir a separate sovereign state.

Voting for National Assembly in Nepal, so many candidates enter the electoral fray

He said that Maharaja Hari Singh had sought India's help because the rebels had entered there. There were criminal incidents and statistics show that the separatists have been trained from Pakistan so that destruction can be done here. The Attorney General said the referendum was not a permanent solution. He gave information about historical events one by one in front of the Constitution Bench, as well as detailed information about the merger of Kashmir into India and the formation of Jammu and Kashmir Constituent Assembly.

MP Tulsi Gabbard filed case of defamation against this person