New Delhi: The Supreme Court has again refused to entertain a plea related to the massacre and migration of Kashmiri Hindus. At the same time, the court has asked the petitioners to find out the correct remedy in the case. The petition was filed by Ashutosh Taploo, son of Tika Lal Taploo, who was killed by Islamist militants in Kashmir. He had asked the Supreme Court to conduct an inquiry into the killing and migration of Kashmiri Hindus. Although the son sought justice for the death of his father, he was told by the court to withdraw his petition.

Refusing to entertain a petition related to the massacre of Kashmiri Hindus, Justice Br Gavai said that such petitions have been rejected in the past. In March this year, a Curative Petition was filed by a Kashmiri Pandit organization against the Supreme Court's 2017 order. In that order, the court had dismissed a plea seeking a probe into the massacre of Kashmiri Hindus during 1989-90 and subsequent years.

The petition, filed by Roots in Kashmir, referred to the supreme court's orders dismissing the july 24, 2017 writ petition and the review petition on October 25, 2017. The court had dismissed the petitions on the ground that more than 27 years have passed since the case and chances of evidence being present were slim. However, it is also worth noting here that the same Supreme Court also heard the massacre of Sikhs (1984 Sikh riots) about 6 years before the massacre of Kashmiri Hindus, ordered an inquiry and also sentenced the accused. In such a situation, a serious question is arising on the Supreme Court that, when the court can hear the massacre of 1984, then why not the gruesome massacre of 1990?

Pak made big mistake by attacking Uri, India gave befitting reply

'I'm in Congress but..,' will Karan Singh also leave party after Azad?

Another Hindu girl murdered in Lakhimpur by Muslim youths